Intellect-Partners

Categories
Automotive Mechanical

Waymo is teaming up with Uber on autonomous trucking after a patent infringement standoff

Waymo and Uber, previous legal foes and harsh opponents in the autonomous vehicle space, are collaborating to accelerate the adoption of driverless trucks. Waymo is incorporating Uber Freight, the ride-hail organization’s truck business, into the innovation that powers its autonomous big rigs.

This “long-term strategic partnership” will enable fleet owners to more rapidly send trucks equipped with Waymo’s autonomous “driver” for on-demand delivery courses presented by Uber Freight, the organizations said.

The declaration addresses a union between two of the organizations’ significant side projects. Waymo separates its autonomous projects into two divisions: Waymo One, its consumer ride-hailing service, and Waymo Via, which is centered around goods delivery in both trucking and local delivery formats. Uber Freight, which was launched in 2017, connects drivers with shippers, much similar to the organization’s ride-hailing application that matches drivers with those searching for a ride.

Waymo depicts the collaboration as a “deep integration” of each organization’s products, including a mutually developed “product roadmap” to outline how autonomous trucks will get conveyed to Uber’s organization once they are commercially ready. Up to that point, Waymo says it will utilize Uber Freight with its test fleet to better comprehend how driverless trucks will receive and accept delivery orders.

Yet, the partnership goes past beta testing each other’s innovation. Waymo said it will save “billions of miles of its goods-only capacity for the Uber Freight network” in a capacity commitment intended to highlight the seriousness of this partnership.

In the not-so-distant past Waymo and Uber were in a grueling standoff over the eventual fate of autonomous vehicles. In February 2017, the Alphabet-owned organization sued Uber and its auxiliary, self-driving truck startup, Otto, over charges of trade secret theft and patent infringement. Waymo looked for $1.4 billion and a public apology from Uber, however, the ride-hail organization dismissed it as a non-starter.

The case went to trial for almost a year, however, finished quickly when the two sides reached an unexpected settlement agreement. Uber later conceded that it misappropriated a portion of Waymo’s tech and promised to permit it for future use. Anthony Levandowski, a previous Google engineer and the organizer behind Otto, was sentenced to 18 months in jail for taking Waymo’s trade secrets however was subsequently pardoned by former President Donald Trump.

There is no notice of past indiscretions in the declaration. Uber had been developing its self-driving truck as a feature of its bigger interest in autonomous innovation however later off-stacked it to Aurora, a startup established by the previous head of Waymo when it was only Google’s self-driving vehicle project. Expanding costs, in addition to the misfortune in Arizona when an Uber self-driving vehicle struck and killed a passerby, constrained Uber to take back its AV project.

Waymo has made a flurry of arrangements lately pointed toward developing its nascent trucking business. The Google spinoff has said it has no plans to possess or work its fleet of trucks and on second thought will work with truck manufacturers, carriers, and representatives to coordinate its innovation into the business of hauling freight.

Categories
Electronics

Parus Files Second Patent Lawsuit Against Samsung for Voice-Browsing and Device Control Technology

Parus Holdings, Inc., a pioneer in voice-empowered advances, reported today that it has documented a second patent encroachment claim in the U.S. Government District Court for the Western District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The claim asserts that Samsung encroaches on Parus’ licenses for voice-browsing and device control tech. The claim depends on U.S. Patent No. 6,721,705, U.S. Patent No. 8,185,402, and U.S Patent No. 7,386,455.

Parus is looking for all accessible remedies, including harms against Samsung for all of its encroaching sales. The claim declares that the encroachment has been “willful,” and demands that the litigant be requested to pay harms and Parus’ attorneys’ expenses and be forever urged from encroaching the Parus Patents.

This is the second claim Parus has recorded against Samsung identifying with its utilization of Parus’ voice-UI advancements for recovering data. The ‘431 and ‘084 Patents are attested in the district legal court cases against Apple, Google, and Samsung (6-19-cv-00432, 6-19-vc-00433, 6-19-vc-00438) in the Western District of Texas and the argument against LG (3-20-cv-05896) in the Northern District of California, all at first documented in 2019.

These locale legal disputes have remained pending the results of different IPRs. Parus likewise has declared various licenses in other district court cases presently pending in the Western District of Texas against Microsoft, Apple, and Google.

“Parus has a responsibility to its customers and shareholders to protect the investments Parus has made in its innovative technologies. Parus intends to vigorously defend its valuable patent portfolio and other intellectual property,” said Taj Reneau, Chairman, and CEO. “We look forward to presenting our case in court and prevailing in this matter.”

Categories
Electronics

Google Infringement On Patents Of Audio Tech Firm Sonos

A US judge has decided that Google encroached upon the
licenses of innovative speakers and sound innovation organization Sonos. As per
an underlying decision from a US International Trade Commission (ITC) judge,
Google encroached on five Sonos licenses.

“We are pleased the ITC has confirmed Google’s blatant
infringement of Sonos’ patented inventions. This decision re-affirms the
strength and breadth of our portfolio, marking a promising milestone in our
long-term pursuit to defend our innovation against misappropriation by Big Tech
monopolies,” According to Sonos’ Chief Legal Officer Eddie Lazarus.

In January last year, Sonos sued tech goliath Google for
purportedly replicating its wireless speaker design, asking the International
Trade Commission (ITC) to boycott Google items like laptops, phones, and
speakers. Sonos CEO Patrick Spence affirmed before the US House antitrust
committee that Google “blocked the company from enabling both Amazon’s
Alexa assistant and the Google Assistant from being active at the same
time”.

Google said in its countersuit that “while Google
rarely sues other companies for patent infringement, it must assert its
intellectual property rights here”. “We are disappointed that Sonos
has made false claims about our work together and technology,” Google
representative Jose Castaneda was cited as saying.

As per Sonos, beginning in 2016 not long after the primary
Google Home was launched, it started cautioning Google about patent
encroachment yet without any result. Sonos said it blamed Google for
encroaching on a sum of 100 licenses.

Google even countersued sound organization Sonos for patent
encroachment, alleging that the tech monster contributed “substantial
Google engineering resources” to help Sonos before. Google has
consistently kept up with that its innovation was grown autonomously and it was
not replicated from Sonos.