Intellect-Partners

Category: Electronics

Categories
Electronics

Parus Files Second Patent Lawsuit Against Samsung for Voice-Browsing and Device Control Technology

Parus Holdings, Inc., a pioneer in voice-empowered advances, reported today that it has documented a second patent encroachment claim in the U.S. Government District Court for the Western District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The claim asserts that Samsung encroaches on Parus’ licenses for voice-browsing and device control tech. The claim depends on U.S. Patent No. 6,721,705, U.S. Patent No. 8,185,402, and U.S Patent No. 7,386,455.

Parus is looking for all accessible remedies, including harms against Samsung for all of its encroaching sales. The claim declares that the encroachment has been “willful,” and demands that the litigant be requested to pay harms and Parus’ attorneys’ expenses and be forever urged from encroaching the Parus Patents.

This is the second claim Parus has recorded against Samsung identifying with its utilization of Parus’ voice-UI advancements for recovering data. The ‘431 and ‘084 Patents are attested in the district legal court cases against Apple, Google, and Samsung (6-19-cv-00432, 6-19-vc-00433, 6-19-vc-00438) in the Western District of Texas and the argument against LG (3-20-cv-05896) in the Northern District of California, all at first documented in 2019.

These locale legal disputes have remained pending the results of different IPRs. Parus likewise has declared various licenses in other district court cases presently pending in the Western District of Texas against Microsoft, Apple, and Google.

“Parus has a responsibility to its customers and shareholders to protect the investments Parus has made in its innovative technologies. Parus intends to vigorously defend its valuable patent portfolio and other intellectual property,” said Taj Reneau, Chairman, and CEO. “We look forward to presenting our case in court and prevailing in this matter.”

Categories
Electronics

Apple Pay again target of a patent infringement suit by RFCyber over mobile payment advancements

Apple was hit with one more claim, with patent possessions firm RFCyber utilizing five bits of licensed innovation against the iPhone producer identifying with mobile payments advancements.

Documented with the U.S. Court for the Western District of Texas, RFCyber’s complaint alleges encroachment of numerous licenses covering contactless mobile payments techniques including NFC, secure components, and different advances carried out in Apple Pay.

Named in the suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,118,218, 9,189,787, 9,240,009, 10,600,046 and 11,018,724, each coming from older IP tracing all the way back to 2006. In particular, the ‘787, ‘009, ‘046, and ‘724 patents are completely identified with, and to a limited extent dependent on, the ‘218 patent recorded in 2006 and allowed in 2012.

By and large, the licenses in-suit, on the whole, portray techniques by which payments are started on a phone and acknowledged by a sale terminal utilizing some type of wireless communication, including NFC and RFID. Internet sales are likewise covered under specific patents.

Key cases utilized in the complaint explicitly target Apple Pay and remember joining of a secure element for the starting device and copying of payment cards. The last allegation is problematic, in any case, as the idea of card imitating spread out in the IP and complaint is a lot more extensive than the secured solution utilized by Apple Pay.

It likewise gives the idea that RFCyber refreshed claims of specific licenses after the dispatch of Apple Pay in 2014 to better position itself should elect to pursue litigation.

The IP was allowed to RFCyber Corporation in Fremont, Calif., and later relegated to a subsidiary office in Texas. A few licenses were additionally relegated to Shenzhen, China-based firm Rich House Global Technology.

Little is known about RFCyber past a new whirlwind of patent prosecution that incorporates almost indistinguishable objections against Google, LG, and Samsung. Google and Samsung documented to audit or nullify claims in the patent reserve.

For its situation against Apple, RFCyber looks for damages, eminences, and court expenses.

The present recording comes fourteen days after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied an allure in a comparative claim brought against Apple by Universal Secure Registry. Like the RFCyber case, USR alleges Apple Pay encroaches on digital wallets and secure user authentication IP.

Categories
Computer Science Electronics

AMD Patent Proposes Teleportation to Make Quantum Computing More Efficient

New AMD Patent Proposes Teleportation to Make Quantum Computing More Efficient

A group of specialists with AMD have documented a patent application that looks toward a more effective and reliable quantum computing architecture, because of a conventional multi-SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) approaches.

As indicated by the application, AMD is exploring a system that expects to utilize quantum teleportation to expand a quantum framework’s reliability, while at the same time reducing the number of qubits necessary for a given calculation. The point is to both alleviate scaling issues and calculation errors coming from framework instability.

There are two significant obstacles making progress toward quantum development and inevitable quantum supremacy: scalability and steadiness. Quantum states are a fickle matter, so sensitive that they can decohere at the smallest incitement – and a quantum framework’s sensitivity will in general increase with the presence of more qubits in a given framework.

The AMD patent, named “Look Ahead Teleportation for Reliable Computation in Multi-SIMD Quantum Processor,” intends to further develop quantum security, adaptability, and performance in novel, more proficient ways. It depicts a quantum engineering dependent on quantum processing regions: spaces of the chip that hold or can hold qubits, ready to pounce for their chance on the preparing pipeline. AMD’s methodology expects to enhance existing quantum models by really diminishing the number of qubits expected to perform complex estimations – through the sci-fi esque idea of quantum teleportation.

AMD’s design intends to transport qubits across districts, empowering workloads that would theoretically need all together execution to become equipped for being prepared in an out-of-order philosophy. As a quick refresher, all together execution highlights conditions between one guidance and the following, implying that responsibility must be prepared successively, with later advances reliant upon the past advance being completely handled and its outcome being known before the chip can push forward with the calculation.

As you might envision, there are chip assets (for this situation, qubits) that sit inactive until it’s their chance to play out the next computation step. Then again, Out-of-order execution analyzes a given workload, sorts out what portions of it are subject to past outcomes and which are not, and executes each step of the instruction that doesn’t need a past outcome, hence further developing execution through expanded parallelism.

AMD’s patent likewise incorporates a look-ahead processor inserted into the design, entrusted to analyze the input workload, anticipate what steps can be tackled in parallel (and those that can’t), and properly distribute the workload across qubits, utilizing a quantum teleporting technique to convey them to the necessary quantum processing, SIMD-based region.

How this quantum teleportation happens isn’t portrayed in the patent – it seems as though AMD is keeping its assets away from plain view on this one. However, it shows, without question and amaze nobody, that AMD is for sure working at quantum computing. That is by all accounts the following the next incredible computing race. And keeping in mind that AMD might be backing the right pony to ride toward an inevitable triumph it appears to be the organization intends to be a part of the race.