Tag: mobilepayments

Categories
Computer Science Electronics

PayPal, Apple Pay Accused of Patent Infringement by Fintiv

PayPal, Apple Pay Accused of Patent Infringement by Fintiv

Mobile payments and commerce platform Fintiv has hit PayPal and Apple Pay with a claim on charges of patent infringement. Fintiv documented a comparative claim against Walmart as well.

Fintiv blamed PayPal for infringing five of its licenses connected with payments functionality, as per court reports. The suit Fintiv brought against Walmart charges that proprietary secrets were utilized improperly. The claim additionally charges that the retail goliath infringed a similar installment patent as PayPal, explicitly, utilizing phone innovation to process payments.

“These three cases are pretty significant for the tech community as a whole,” says Court Coursey, a director with Fintiv. “If you see one of these cases become a victory, I think you’ll see the rest become license deals pretty quickly.”

The complaint against PayPal was documented recently and looks for harms, sovereignties, and related court and legal expenses, plus interest.

“We’re talking billions of dollars here,” Sol Saad, a Florida tech investment banker, told in certain reports. His firms have advised Fintiv in the past. “This would include future royalties but also back payments for prior years of infringement.”

“Fintiv has a strong patent portfolio of over 150 patents, in addition to a large number of patent continuations and patents pending,” Saad told in reports. He explained that Mozido, Fintiv’s predecessor company, invented and patented the ideas necessary to create the mobile payments before the technology to power those ideas had been developed and has followed up with subsequent patents as the technology to support them emerged.

Mozido, Fintiv’s ancestor organization, established a phone-based payment settlement business with Western Union and Radio Shack in early 2008.

Fintiv at first hit Apple with a claim in December 2018. In October 2019, Apple documented a request to take a gander at the licenses. Apple was denied the patent review in May 2020. A trial was initially set for March 2021.

Presently the trial is planned for June in United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in June 2022.

Categories
Electronics

Apple Pay again target of a patent infringement suit by RFCyber over mobile payment advancements

Apple was hit with one more claim, with patent possessions firm RFCyber utilizing five bits of licensed innovation against the iPhone producer identifying with mobile payments advancements.

Documented with the U.S. Court for the Western District of Texas, RFCyber’s complaint alleges encroachment of numerous licenses covering contactless mobile payments techniques including NFC, secure components, and different advances carried out in Apple Pay.

Named in the suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,118,218, 9,189,787, 9,240,009, 10,600,046 and 11,018,724, each coming from older IP tracing all the way back to 2006. In particular, the ‘787, ‘009, ‘046, and ‘724 patents are completely identified with, and to a limited extent dependent on, the ‘218 patent recorded in 2006 and allowed in 2012.

By and large, the licenses in-suit, on the whole, portray techniques by which payments are started on a phone and acknowledged by a sale terminal utilizing some type of wireless communication, including NFC and RFID. Internet sales are likewise covered under specific patents.

Key cases utilized in the complaint explicitly target Apple Pay and remember joining of a secure element for the starting device and copying of payment cards. The last allegation is problematic, in any case, as the idea of card imitating spread out in the IP and complaint is a lot more extensive than the secured solution utilized by Apple Pay.

It likewise gives the idea that RFCyber refreshed claims of specific licenses after the dispatch of Apple Pay in 2014 to better position itself should elect to pursue litigation.

The IP was allowed to RFCyber Corporation in Fremont, Calif., and later relegated to a subsidiary office in Texas. A few licenses were additionally relegated to Shenzhen, China-based firm Rich House Global Technology.

Little is known about RFCyber past a new whirlwind of patent prosecution that incorporates almost indistinguishable objections against Google, LG, and Samsung. Google and Samsung documented to audit or nullify claims in the patent reserve.

For its situation against Apple, RFCyber looks for damages, eminences, and court expenses.

The present recording comes fourteen days after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied an allure in a comparative claim brought against Apple by Universal Secure Registry. Like the RFCyber case, USR alleges Apple Pay encroaches on digital wallets and secure user authentication IP.