Intellect-Partners

Tag: patent

Categories
Computer Science Electronics

Apple patents for FaceID for masked faces and gestures in video conferencing

Apple patents for FaceID for masked faces, gestures in video conferencing

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has distributed
an aggregate of 56 recently conceded licenses for Apple, including one to
adjust the organization’s device biometrics according to current conditions.

Among the reports, which were spotted by Patently Apple, is
a patent depicting mask detection abilities for Face ID, and one conceivably
empowering people to utilize communication through sign language or gestures in
video conferencing.

The main patent has been purportedly drafted by Apple to work with biometric user identification as numerous users keep on wearing face masks to restrict the spread of COVID-19.

Figure from US Patent No. 11,163,981 B2

The report portrays an automated ‘switch’ between a full-face
facial recognition authentication cycle and partial face facial recognition
verification — the innovation will endeavor to attempt the full face facial
recognition authentication process when certain facial features like the eyes,
nose, and mouth, are visible, and change to partial face recognition when it
registers a portion of these facial features as at least partially impeded.

As indicated by the patent’s text, Apple is training the
incomplete face facial recognition authentication process utilizing similar
pictures as the full-face facial acknowledgment one, however, Apple added that
a portion of the pictures might be cropped for use in preparing for the latter
process.

The subsequent biometrics-related patent Apple was allowed last week alludes to ‘techniques for visual prominence of participants in a video conference.’ The document referenced applications identified with circumstances where conference participants communicate utilizing sign language or visual props.

The device would create a sign of a member’s visual
prominence in a video meeting, encode a video stream of it, and afterward
communicate it along with the visual prominence indication to a receiving
device in the video conference.

Categories
Computer Science Electronics

New Apple Glasses patent may project visuals straight onto your eyeballs

(Image credit: Shutterstock / Girts Ragelis)

Apple has recorded a patent that determines an innovation that can project a light field straightforwardly onto a client’s pupil. The organization means to dispose of the predominant issues with AR and VR headsets with the science fiction-like innovation.

Apple is working on a way of fixing the pervasive issues with (AR) and (VR) headsets. A new patent recorded by the tech significant reveals insight into this continuous work and uncovers a fair science fiction answer for the issues – projecting the visuals directly onto your retina.

The recently recorded patent by Apple, as first spotted by Apple Insider, talks of a “direct retinal projector” that will project light field directly to the pupil of the wearer of the gadget. The innovation, prone to be a piece of Apple Glasses, later on, will likewise incorporate a “gaze tracking system” that tracks the situation of a subject’s pupil and naturally changes the projection appropriately.

The innovation will justifiably work similarly as we see objects normally from our eyes. As light reflected from the environmental factors enters the pupil, we can see the sight before us. The innovation by Apple will probably work along these lines once prepared, just the light being projected won’t be from our environmental factors however from what the AR/VR wearable is projecting.

Apple’s innovation resolves some key issues that plague the current AR and VR headsets. Instead of what the patent talks about, the current headsets use screens to project the visuals. Through the headsets, these screens are set truly near the eyes to give the illusion that the visuals are going on all around us. Though any individual who has at any point utilized a VR headset will let you know that it doesn’t work completely constantly. There are often mismatch problems with the focal lengths, making aggravations in the experience. In easier words, you will in general become mindful at certain focuses that you are wearing a headset and it is all a visual. It is likewise blurry or out of focus, frequently in such circumstances because of arrangement mismatch.

However, any individual who has at any point utilized a VR headset will let you know that it doesn’t work perfectly all the time. There are frequently mismatch problems with the central lengths, making disturbances in the experience. In more straightforward words, you will in general become mindful at certain points that you are wearing a headset and it is all a visual. It additionally goes blurry or out of focus, regularly in such circumstances because of alignment mismatch.

This mismatch creates further problems for the wearer, like eyestrain, headaches, or nausea with prolonged use. In addition, the weight of the headset is also a pain to bear after a point. Due to these reasons, AR and VR experiences are usually limited to hardly 15 to 20 minutes at one go.

This jumble makes further issues for the wearer, similar to eyestrain, cerebral pains, or sickness with delayed use. Likewise, the heaviness of the headset is additionally an agony to bear after a point. Because of these reasons, AR and VR encounters are normally restricted to barely 15 to 20 minutes at one go.

In case Apple can break the better approach for projecting such visuals, and the patent suggests that it has, it will want to change the AR and VR industry as far as we know it today. Its answer will be an exceptional, trendy innovation that will appear to be straight out of a science fiction film, and will just miss the mark regarding Elon Musk’s concept of projecting data directly into the cerebrum.

Categories
Electronics

Nokia files multiple patent infringement cases against Oppo

Nokia has recorded different claims against Oppo for purportedly utilizing its protected tech on its products without a legitimate permitting arrangement between the organizations.

Nokia has purportedly recorded different claims against Chinese innovation major Oppo. The claims allege that the organization keeps on utilizing Nokia’s protected innovations for its products without a substantial permit arrangement.

The patent encroachment arguments by Nokia against Oppo have been documented in a few parts of Europe and Asia, including India, UK, France, and Germany. The claims assert that the encroachment includes a portion of Nokia’s standard-essential licenses (SEPs) and non-SEPs, similar to the UI and security highlights.

The distribution affirmed as of late that Nokia is suing Oppo over patent encroachment, following the end of a license arrangement between the two organizations that was endorsed back in November 2018.

The understanding permitted Oppo to utilize Nokia’s licensed advancements. It supposedly ended in June this year, with a renewal due post that. For reasons unknown, Oppo didn’t renew this agreement and kept on utilizing the protected advances on its products without it.

Nokia supposedly guarantees that Oppo’s proceeded practice violates its privileges by utilizing its licensed advancements for benefits. It hence seeks legal activity action Oppo in the greater part of its global business sectors. It likely seeks an arrangement like the previous one that necessary Oppo to pay around EUR 3 (~Rs 270) per telephone to Nokia for every one of the gadgets that utilized Nokia’s protected innovation.

Not all subtleties of the lawful activity have been unveiled as of now. Be that as it may, both the organizations have reacted to the cases. In a connection with NokiaMob, Nokia guaranteed that it was Oppo who dismissed Nokia’s “fair and reasonable” offers to renew the authorizing understanding and that it looks for litigation if all else fails.

In the meantime, Oppo portrays the claims by Nokia as surprising and faults it for “dishonoring” the patent authorizing under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. It further portrays prosecution as an outlandish consultation in the matter.

This isn’t the first occasion when that Nokia has recorded a patent encroachment claim against another firm. The Finnish tech major has authorized its licenses to a few firms throughout the long term and incidentally has been in a legitimate tussle to ensure them. The latest ones were with Lenovo and Daimler, the two of which have now been settled with classified arrangements between the companies.