Intellect-Partners

Category: Electronics

Categories
Electronics

Google Infringement On Patents Of Audio Tech Firm Sonos

A US judge has decided that Google encroached upon the
licenses of innovative speakers and sound innovation organization Sonos. As per
an underlying decision from a US International Trade Commission (ITC) judge,
Google encroached on five Sonos licenses.

“We are pleased the ITC has confirmed Google’s blatant
infringement of Sonos’ patented inventions. This decision re-affirms the
strength and breadth of our portfolio, marking a promising milestone in our
long-term pursuit to defend our innovation against misappropriation by Big Tech
monopolies,” According to Sonos’ Chief Legal Officer Eddie Lazarus.

In January last year, Sonos sued tech goliath Google for
purportedly replicating its wireless speaker design, asking the International
Trade Commission (ITC) to boycott Google items like laptops, phones, and
speakers. Sonos CEO Patrick Spence affirmed before the US House antitrust
committee that Google “blocked the company from enabling both Amazon’s
Alexa assistant and the Google Assistant from being active at the same
time”.

Google said in its countersuit that “while Google
rarely sues other companies for patent infringement, it must assert its
intellectual property rights here”. “We are disappointed that Sonos
has made false claims about our work together and technology,” Google
representative Jose Castaneda was cited as saying.

As per Sonos, beginning in 2016 not long after the primary
Google Home was launched, it started cautioning Google about patent
encroachment yet without any result. Sonos said it blamed Google for
encroaching on a sum of 100 licenses.

Google even countersued sound organization Sonos for patent
encroachment, alleging that the tech monster contributed “substantial
Google engineering resources” to help Sonos before. Google has
consistently kept up with that its innovation was grown autonomously and it was
not replicated from Sonos.

Categories
Computer Science Electronics

AlgoFace wins patent for text search technique with face images lacking tags

A mostly secret startup in Arizona has been conceded a U.S. patent for a neural organization equipped for looking through facial pictures on live video feeds, progressively, utilizing text inquiries and without data-labeling.

In its declaration of the patent, AlgoFace says its edge-based biometric facial analysis software empowers searches without identifying a subject utilizing still or video content from conventional color and near-infrared cameras.

The organization has expressed that its software is not a facial recognition tech and, indeed, it will “never enter any industry where a false positive or false negative from our artificial intelligence technologies can be used to rob a person of their human rights.”

In a responsibility just great as long as AlgoFace possesses the licensed tech or stays an independent business, the firm says it “will never enter the facial recognition industry.”

Other programming organizations as of now are in the facial recognition search engine field, including Baidu, which was testing algorithms in 2012. Among the proposed applications for the procedure, as indicated by the organization, are useful face web search tools and programmatic promoting.

As will virtually all advancements related to face biometrics, AlgoFace promises better, “unbiased” searches for lost or abducted children caught on live video. In this case, it would require typing “a basic description.”

As will all headways identified with face biometrics, AlgoFace guarantees better, “unbiased” searches for lost or kidnapped youngsters caught on live video. For this situation, it would require composing “a basic description.”

The product can identify and follow 209 facial landmarks, including foreheads and inner cheeks, as per the organization. Each eye allegedly is allowed 50 landmarks. Precision is allegedly not influenced by masks.

Categories
Electronics

Nokia files multiple patent infringement cases against Oppo

Nokia has recorded different claims against Oppo for purportedly utilizing its protected tech on its products without a legitimate permitting arrangement between the organizations.

Nokia has purportedly recorded different claims against Chinese innovation major Oppo. The claims allege that the organization keeps on utilizing Nokia’s protected innovations for its products without a substantial permit arrangement.

The patent encroachment arguments by Nokia against Oppo have been documented in a few parts of Europe and Asia, including India, UK, France, and Germany. The claims assert that the encroachment includes a portion of Nokia’s standard-essential licenses (SEPs) and non-SEPs, similar to the UI and security highlights.

The distribution affirmed as of late that Nokia is suing Oppo over patent encroachment, following the end of a license arrangement between the two organizations that was endorsed back in November 2018.

The understanding permitted Oppo to utilize Nokia’s licensed advancements. It supposedly ended in June this year, with a renewal due post that. For reasons unknown, Oppo didn’t renew this agreement and kept on utilizing the protected advances on its products without it.

Nokia supposedly guarantees that Oppo’s proceeded practice violates its privileges by utilizing its licensed advancements for benefits. It hence seeks legal activity action Oppo in the greater part of its global business sectors. It likely seeks an arrangement like the previous one that necessary Oppo to pay around EUR 3 (~Rs 270) per telephone to Nokia for every one of the gadgets that utilized Nokia’s protected innovation.

Not all subtleties of the lawful activity have been unveiled as of now. Be that as it may, both the organizations have reacted to the cases. In a connection with NokiaMob, Nokia guaranteed that it was Oppo who dismissed Nokia’s “fair and reasonable” offers to renew the authorizing understanding and that it looks for litigation if all else fails.

In the meantime, Oppo portrays the claims by Nokia as surprising and faults it for “dishonoring” the patent authorizing under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. It further portrays prosecution as an outlandish consultation in the matter.

This isn’t the first occasion when that Nokia has recorded a patent encroachment claim against another firm. The Finnish tech major has authorized its licenses to a few firms throughout the long term and incidentally has been in a legitimate tussle to ensure them. The latest ones were with Lenovo and Daimler, the two of which have now been settled with classified arrangements between the companies.