Categories
Automotive Electronics Mechanical

Intellect Partners – Our Security, Customer Focus, and Unique Approach

Download Intellect Partners’ new Whitepaper for a nitty-gritty point of view of our continuous commitment to security, privacy, and consistency.

In this undeniably advanced connected world, all organizations, regardless of their area of operations, need to guarantee that they have the fitting degree of digital trust. As such, the proportion of confidence partners will have in an organization’s capacity to safeguard their private data and secure their information.

Our new Whitepaper explains our far-reaching responsibility for security, privacy, and consistency. Created in view of our clients, we offer deep insights and answers into how we can oblige most prerequisites with regards to the confidentiality and security of information.

You can download the full Whitepaper from here:

* Do you trust your IP partners with your information?

* Do they have advanced security measures to prevent a data breach?

* Does your IP partner prioritize Data Privacy?

If you are blank reading all these questions, Maybe it is time to switch to Intellect Partners.

Categories
Computer Science Electronics Others

Revitalization Partners Sues Google and YouTube for Patent Infringement

Arriving at an essential achievement in its four-year venture as the court-appointed receiver for pioneering digital information and advertising organization AudienceScience Inc., Seattle-based Revitalization Partners has recorded suit against Google LLC and YouTube LLC for infringing on three of the licenses held by the receivership and the previous organization’s estate.

Revitalization Partners, for AudienceScience, claims that both Google and YouTube infringe upon the innovations of AudienceScience by choosing and assigning which advertising messages are incorporated when a client requests a web page. The intellectual property litigation is trusted to be the first-ever that a state receiver-initiated. Revitalization Partners at first found the patents after AudienceScience stopped everyday organization operations in 2017.

AudienceScience invented and licensed a significant number of the fundamental advancements utilized across the digital advertising industry today. Among its developments: the industry’s first behavioral targeting product, empowering publishers all through the world to serve more significant advertising based on both user history and page context. This advancement started the empowerment of advertisers to purchase highly targeted digital media.

Revitalization Partners co-founder and principal Al Davis said his firm found approximately 32 AudienceScience patents in the wake of being delegated by the court to deal with the receivership cycle. Working with Pat Scanlon, head of RP’s advanced business practice, the firm started developing a methodology to adapt the worth of those proprietary techs to fulfill creditor obligations. The suit against Google and YouTube addresses the first of those legal actions.

Mr. Davis said, “As we did our due diligence, we quickly recognized how the patents were being infringed upon by two of the largest and most influential companies in the online world. Now that we’ve received the necessary approvals from the Washington State receivership court to pursue litigation, we are in a position to execute and potentially recover a significant amount of value for creditors using these and other patents.”

Revitalization Partners involved in Silicon Valley IP patent case lead counsel Robert Kramer of the Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich and Belloli LLP firm to represent the firm in the case against Google and YouTube, alongside local counsel The Dacus Firm in Tyler, Texas.

Categories
Electronics

Google Infringement On Patents Of Audio Tech Firm Sonos

A US judge has decided that Google encroached upon the
licenses of innovative speakers and sound innovation organization Sonos. As per
an underlying decision from a US International Trade Commission (ITC) judge,
Google encroached on five Sonos licenses.

“We are pleased the ITC has confirmed Google’s blatant
infringement of Sonos’ patented inventions. This decision re-affirms the
strength and breadth of our portfolio, marking a promising milestone in our
long-term pursuit to defend our innovation against misappropriation by Big Tech
monopolies,” According to Sonos’ Chief Legal Officer Eddie Lazarus.

In January last year, Sonos sued tech goliath Google for
purportedly replicating its wireless speaker design, asking the International
Trade Commission (ITC) to boycott Google items like laptops, phones, and
speakers. Sonos CEO Patrick Spence affirmed before the US House antitrust
committee that Google “blocked the company from enabling both Amazon’s
Alexa assistant and the Google Assistant from being active at the same
time”.

Google said in its countersuit that “while Google
rarely sues other companies for patent infringement, it must assert its
intellectual property rights here”. “We are disappointed that Sonos
has made false claims about our work together and technology,” Google
representative Jose Castaneda was cited as saying.

As per Sonos, beginning in 2016 not long after the primary
Google Home was launched, it started cautioning Google about patent
encroachment yet without any result. Sonos said it blamed Google for
encroaching on a sum of 100 licenses.

Google even countersued sound organization Sonos for patent
encroachment, alleging that the tech monster contributed “substantial
Google engineering resources” to help Sonos before. Google has
consistently kept up with that its innovation was grown autonomously and it was
not replicated from Sonos.