Intellect-Partners

Tag: patentinfringement

Categories
Electronics

Parus Files Second Patent Lawsuit Against Samsung for Voice-Browsing and Device Control Technology

Parus Holdings, Inc., a pioneer in voice-empowered advances, reported today that it has documented a second patent encroachment claim in the U.S. Government District Court for the Western District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The claim asserts that Samsung encroaches on Parus’ licenses for voice-browsing and device control tech. The claim depends on U.S. Patent No. 6,721,705, U.S. Patent No. 8,185,402, and U.S Patent No. 7,386,455.

Parus is looking for all accessible remedies, including harms against Samsung for all of its encroaching sales. The claim declares that the encroachment has been “willful,” and demands that the litigant be requested to pay harms and Parus’ attorneys’ expenses and be forever urged from encroaching the Parus Patents.

This is the second claim Parus has recorded against Samsung identifying with its utilization of Parus’ voice-UI advancements for recovering data. The ‘431 and ‘084 Patents are attested in the district legal court cases against Apple, Google, and Samsung (6-19-cv-00432, 6-19-vc-00433, 6-19-vc-00438) in the Western District of Texas and the argument against LG (3-20-cv-05896) in the Northern District of California, all at first documented in 2019.

These locale legal disputes have remained pending the results of different IPRs. Parus likewise has declared various licenses in other district court cases presently pending in the Western District of Texas against Microsoft, Apple, and Google.

“Parus has a responsibility to its customers and shareholders to protect the investments Parus has made in its innovative technologies. Parus intends to vigorously defend its valuable patent portfolio and other intellectual property,” said Taj Reneau, Chairman, and CEO. “We look forward to presenting our case in court and prevailing in this matter.”

Categories
Electronics

Apple Pay again target of a patent infringement suit by RFCyber over mobile payment advancements

Apple was hit with one more claim, with patent possessions firm RFCyber utilizing five bits of licensed innovation against the iPhone producer identifying with mobile payments advancements.

Documented with the U.S. Court for the Western District of Texas, RFCyber’s complaint alleges encroachment of numerous licenses covering contactless mobile payments techniques including NFC, secure components, and different advances carried out in Apple Pay.

Named in the suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,118,218, 9,189,787, 9,240,009, 10,600,046 and 11,018,724, each coming from older IP tracing all the way back to 2006. In particular, the ‘787, ‘009, ‘046, and ‘724 patents are completely identified with, and to a limited extent dependent on, the ‘218 patent recorded in 2006 and allowed in 2012.

By and large, the licenses in-suit, on the whole, portray techniques by which payments are started on a phone and acknowledged by a sale terminal utilizing some type of wireless communication, including NFC and RFID. Internet sales are likewise covered under specific patents.

Key cases utilized in the complaint explicitly target Apple Pay and remember joining of a secure element for the starting device and copying of payment cards. The last allegation is problematic, in any case, as the idea of card imitating spread out in the IP and complaint is a lot more extensive than the secured solution utilized by Apple Pay.

It likewise gives the idea that RFCyber refreshed claims of specific licenses after the dispatch of Apple Pay in 2014 to better position itself should elect to pursue litigation.

The IP was allowed to RFCyber Corporation in Fremont, Calif., and later relegated to a subsidiary office in Texas. A few licenses were additionally relegated to Shenzhen, China-based firm Rich House Global Technology.

Little is known about RFCyber past a new whirlwind of patent prosecution that incorporates almost indistinguishable objections against Google, LG, and Samsung. Google and Samsung documented to audit or nullify claims in the patent reserve.

For its situation against Apple, RFCyber looks for damages, eminences, and court expenses.

The present recording comes fourteen days after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied an allure in a comparative claim brought against Apple by Universal Secure Registry. Like the RFCyber case, USR alleges Apple Pay encroaches on digital wallets and secure user authentication IP.