Tag: patentinfringement

Categories
Computer Science Electronics

PayPal, Apple Pay Accused of Patent Infringement by Fintiv

PayPal, Apple Pay Accused of Patent Infringement by Fintiv

Mobile payments and commerce platform Fintiv has hit PayPal and Apple Pay with a claim on charges of patent infringement. Fintiv documented a comparative claim against Walmart as well.

Fintiv blamed PayPal for infringing five of its licenses connected with payments functionality, as per court reports. The suit Fintiv brought against Walmart charges that proprietary secrets were utilized improperly. The claim additionally charges that the retail goliath infringed a similar installment patent as PayPal, explicitly, utilizing phone innovation to process payments.

“These three cases are pretty significant for the tech community as a whole,” says Court Coursey, a director with Fintiv. “If you see one of these cases become a victory, I think you’ll see the rest become license deals pretty quickly.”

The complaint against PayPal was documented recently and looks for harms, sovereignties, and related court and legal expenses, plus interest.

“We’re talking billions of dollars here,” Sol Saad, a Florida tech investment banker, told in certain reports. His firms have advised Fintiv in the past. “This would include future royalties but also back payments for prior years of infringement.”

“Fintiv has a strong patent portfolio of over 150 patents, in addition to a large number of patent continuations and patents pending,” Saad told in reports. He explained that Mozido, Fintiv’s predecessor company, invented and patented the ideas necessary to create the mobile payments before the technology to power those ideas had been developed and has followed up with subsequent patents as the technology to support them emerged.

Mozido, Fintiv’s ancestor organization, established a phone-based payment settlement business with Western Union and Radio Shack in early 2008.

Fintiv at first hit Apple with a claim in December 2018. In October 2019, Apple documented a request to take a gander at the licenses. Apple was denied the patent review in May 2020. A trial was initially set for March 2021.

Presently the trial is planned for June in United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in June 2022.

Categories
Computer Science Electronics Others

Revitalization Partners Sues Google and YouTube for Patent Infringement

Arriving at an essential achievement in its four-year venture as the court-appointed receiver for pioneering digital information and advertising organization AudienceScience Inc., Seattle-based Revitalization Partners has recorded suit against Google LLC and YouTube LLC for infringing on three of the licenses held by the receivership and the previous organization’s estate.

Revitalization Partners, for AudienceScience, claims that both Google and YouTube infringe upon the innovations of AudienceScience by choosing and assigning which advertising messages are incorporated when a client requests a web page. The intellectual property litigation is trusted to be the first-ever that a state receiver-initiated. Revitalization Partners at first found the patents after AudienceScience stopped everyday organization operations in 2017.

AudienceScience invented and licensed a significant number of the fundamental advancements utilized across the digital advertising industry today. Among its developments: the industry’s first behavioral targeting product, empowering publishers all through the world to serve more significant advertising based on both user history and page context. This advancement started the empowerment of advertisers to purchase highly targeted digital media.

Revitalization Partners co-founder and principal Al Davis said his firm found approximately 32 AudienceScience patents in the wake of being delegated by the court to deal with the receivership cycle. Working with Pat Scanlon, head of RP’s advanced business practice, the firm started developing a methodology to adapt the worth of those proprietary techs to fulfill creditor obligations. The suit against Google and YouTube addresses the first of those legal actions.

Mr. Davis said, “As we did our due diligence, we quickly recognized how the patents were being infringed upon by two of the largest and most influential companies in the online world. Now that we’ve received the necessary approvals from the Washington State receivership court to pursue litigation, we are in a position to execute and potentially recover a significant amount of value for creditors using these and other patents.”

Revitalization Partners involved in Silicon Valley IP patent case lead counsel Robert Kramer of the Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich and Belloli LLP firm to represent the firm in the case against Google and YouTube, alongside local counsel The Dacus Firm in Tyler, Texas.

Categories
Electronics

Parus Files Second Patent Lawsuit Against Samsung for Voice-Browsing and Device Control Technology

Parus Holdings, Inc., a pioneer in voice-empowered advances, reported today that it has documented a second patent encroachment claim in the U.S. Government District Court for the Western District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The claim asserts that Samsung encroaches on Parus’ licenses for voice-browsing and device control tech. The claim depends on U.S. Patent No. 6,721,705, U.S. Patent No. 8,185,402, and U.S Patent No. 7,386,455.

Parus is looking for all accessible remedies, including harms against Samsung for all of its encroaching sales. The claim declares that the encroachment has been “willful,” and demands that the litigant be requested to pay harms and Parus’ attorneys’ expenses and be forever urged from encroaching the Parus Patents.

This is the second claim Parus has recorded against Samsung identifying with its utilization of Parus’ voice-UI advancements for recovering data. The ‘431 and ‘084 Patents are attested in the district legal court cases against Apple, Google, and Samsung (6-19-cv-00432, 6-19-vc-00433, 6-19-vc-00438) in the Western District of Texas and the argument against LG (3-20-cv-05896) in the Northern District of California, all at first documented in 2019.

These locale legal disputes have remained pending the results of different IPRs. Parus likewise has declared various licenses in other district court cases presently pending in the Western District of Texas against Microsoft, Apple, and Google.

“Parus has a responsibility to its customers and shareholders to protect the investments Parus has made in its innovative technologies. Parus intends to vigorously defend its valuable patent portfolio and other intellectual property,” said Taj Reneau, Chairman, and CEO. “We look forward to presenting our case in court and prevailing in this matter.”